Рус Eng Cn Перевести страницу на:  
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Библиотека
 ваш профиль
Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC Статья опубликована с лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) – Лицензия «С указанием авторства – Некоммерческая».
Вернуться к содержанию

Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations
Правильная ссылка на статью:

Шугуров М.В. Соглашение ТРИПС, международный трансфер технологий и последствия усиления защиты прав интеллектуальной собственности

Аннотация: Предметом исследования является содержание и последствия реализации Соглашения о торговых аспектах прав интеллектуальной собственности (ТРИПС) на международный трансфер технологий в развивающиеся страны. Автор подробно останавливается на вопросах, возникающих при защите прав на передаваемые технологии, преимущественно патентных прав, в процессе передачи и диффузии разнообразных технологий. Помимо этого в статье исследуется логика международных усилий по защите прав интеллектуальной собственности до принятия ТРИПС. Автор детально рассматривает содержание ст. 7 и 8, в которых предусматривается баланс между правами и интересами правообладателей с одной стороны, и правами и интересами пользователей технологий - с другой. В статье анализируются проблемы передачи технологий в наименее развитые страны в свете ст. 66.2 ТРИПС. Важное место в исследовании занимает анализ дискуссий относительно последствий имплементации ТРИПС, связанных с несомненным усилением защиты прав интеллектуальной собственности для международного трансфера технологий. Автором сделан вывод о том, что при переходе к эпохе "ТРИПС-плюс" развивающиеся страны оказываются заинтересованными в настойчивой реализации потенциала ТРИПС, а именно гибких механизмов, предусмотренных в данном Соглашении. В качестве методологической основы исследования выступает концепция, рассматривающая передаваемые технологии в качестве глобальных благ. Автор исходит также из общего видения противоречивого воздействия прав интеллектуальной собственности на достижения целей международного трансфера технологий. Особую методологическую ценность для статьи имела концепция о том, что права интеллектуальной собственности должны выступать не барьером, а инструментом передачи технологий, без которых реализация права на развитие сегодня не представима. Основными выводами проведенного исследования выступают положения о неоднозначном характере воздействия ТРИПС на международный трансфер технологий. При этом данный вывод конкретизируется относительно различных групп государств. Особым вкладом автора в исследование темы стал системный анализ места прав интеллектуальной собственности в международном обмене технологическими достижениями. Новизна исследования заключается в формулировке аргументированного подхода о том, что несмотря на акцентирование торговых и экономических аспектов передачи технологий, положения ТРИПС в целом базируются на принципе баланса интересов развитых и развивающихся государств и отличаются преимуществами по сравнению с положениями ТРИПС-плюс.


Ключевые слова:

ТРИПС, международный трансфер технологий, право на развитие, патенты, развивающиеся государства, глобализация, формирование потенциала, интеллектуальная собственность, ТРИПС-плюс, гибкие механизмы

Abstract: The subject of this research is the content and consequences of the execution of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) upon the international transfer of technologies into developing countries. The author gives a detailed attention to the issues arising in protection of rights to the transfer technologies, predominantly the patent rights, in the process of transfer and diffusion of various technologies. The article also analyzes the logic of international efforts on protection of intellectual property prior to the TRIPS agreement. The author gives a detailed examination to the content of Articles 7 and 8, which provide balance between the rights and interests of the copyright holders on one side, and the rights and interests of the users on the other. This research addresses the issue of transfer of technologies to the less developed countries in light of the Article 66.2 of the TRIPS agreement. The main conclusions of the conducted research are the positions on the ambiguous nature of the effect of TRIPS upon the international transfer of technologies. Moreover, this conclusion is concretized pertaining to various groups of countries. The author’s contribution into the research of this topic is the systemic analysis of the place of rights of intellectual property within the international exchange of technological achievements.  

Keywords:

capacity building, globalization, developing countries, patents, right to development, international technology transfer, TRIPS, intellectual property rights, TRIPS-plus, flexibilities


Эта статья может быть бесплатно загружена в формате PDF для чтения. Обращаем ваше внимание на необходимость соблюдения авторских прав, указания библиографической ссылки на статью при цитировании.

Скачать статью

Библиография
[1. Committee on Development and Intellectual property (CDIP). (Fourth Session, Geneva, November 16 to 20, 2009). Comments received by WIPO on the Comments of a Group Like-Minded Countries on the Project on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: Common Challenges: Building Solutions (CDIP/4/7). Annex. Available at http://www.wipo.int/meeting/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=17460. ]
[2. WIPO. CDIP. Неофициальный документ по ИС и передаче техноло-гий «Общие проблемы – построение решений». Неофициальный документ № 1. CDIP/5(R) (12/03/2010). Приложение II. Available at http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/cdip_5/cdip_5_ref_non_paper.pdf. ]
[3. Hoekman, B. and B. Smarzyncka Javorcik (eds.), 2006. Global integra-tion and technology transfer. World Bank publications, Washington (346 p.). ]
[4. Saggi, K. 2002. Trade, foreing direct investment, and international technology transfer: а survey. World Bank Observer. 17(2): 191-235. ]
[5. Smith, P. J., 2001. How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sale, and Licenses? In: Journal of International Economics. Vol. 55(2): 411-440. ]
[6. Kim, L., 2003. Technology transfer and intellectual property rights: Lessons from Korea's experience. UNCTAD/ICTSD Working paper No. 2, Ge-neva (41 p.). Available at http://www.ictsd.org/downloads/2008/06/cs_kim.pdf. ]
[7. Kim, L., 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Harvard Business School press, Boston (308 p.). ]
[8. Rasiah, R., 2002. TRIPS an industrial technology development in East and South Asia. In: The European Journal of Development Research. Vol. 14(1): 171-199. ]
[9. Mashelkar, R. 2002. IPRs and the third world. In: Intellectual property rights and the third word. Vol.7(4): 308-323. ]
[10. Falvey, R., Foster, N. and D. Greenaway, 2006. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. In: Review of Development Economics. Vol. 10(4): 700-719. ]
[11. Lal, A. K. and R. W. Clement, 2005. Economic development in India: the role of individual enterprise. In: Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), Center on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok. Vol. 12(2): 81-99. ]
[12. Correa, C., 2007. Intellectual property in LDCs for enhancing technol-ogy transfer and dissemination. UNCTAD, Background paper No. 4, Geneva (40 p.). Available at http://unctad.org/Sections/Idc_dir/docs/Idcr2007_correa_en.pdf. ]
[13. WIPO Patent Law Treaty, 2000. Available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=288996. ]
[14. WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty, 1970. Available at http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/articles/atoc.htm. ]
[15. Shugurov M. V. Perspectives of international technology transfer in the TRIPs-plus era: problems and solutions. In: European Journal of Social and Human Sciences. 2015. Vol. 5(1): 48-57. ]
[16. Maskus, K., Saggi, K. and T. Puttitanun, 2007. Patent rights and inter-national technology transfer through direct investment and licensing. Paper prepared for the conference “International Public Goods and the Transfer of Technology after TRIPS”. Duke University School, April 4-6, 2003. Available at http://spot.colorado.edu/-maskus/research.html. ]
[17. Kadah, M. M., 2003. Foreing direct investment and international tech-nology transfer to Egypt. In: Economic Research Forum Working paper No. 0317 (23 p.). http://www.egyptchm.org/chm/implementation/pdf/tech_transfer/foreing_direct.pdf. ]
[18. Kingston, G. K. The Implications of 'TRIPS' Agreement 1994 of the World Trade Organization for developing countries. In: African Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 1(1): 37-64. ]
[19. Branstetter, L. G., R. Fisman and C. F. Foley, 2006. Do stronger intel-lectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evi-dence from U.S. firm-level panel data. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 121(1): 320-350. ]
[20. Park, W. G. and D. Lippoldt, 2008. Technology transfer and the eco-nomic implications of strengthening of intellectual property rights in developing countries, OECD Trade Policy working paper No. 62, OECD, Paris (59 p.). Available at http://nw08.american.edu/~wgp/park_lippoldt08.pdf. ]
[21. Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi, 2008. The role of foreing direct investment in international technology transfer: a survey. In: Dutt, A. and J. Ros, (eds.), 2008. International Handbook of Development economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Vol. 2. (612 p.). ]
[22. Thompson, M. A. and F. W. Rushing, 1999. An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth: An Extension. In: Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute of Chung-Ang Uni-versity. Vol. 24 (1): 67-79. ]
[23. Chen, Y. and T. Puttitanun, 2005. IPRs and innovation in developing countries. In: Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 78(2): 474-493. ]
[24. Hall, B. H., 2014. Does patents protection help or hinder technology transfer? In: Ahn, S., Hall, B. H. and K. Lee (eds.) Intellectual property for economic development: issues and policy implication, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Northampton (328 p.). ]
[25. Kumar, N., 2002. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: experience of Asian countries, Study Paper 1b, Ch. 1, Commission on Intellectual Property (18 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final-report/Ch.1final.pdf. ]
[26. Pandey, B. N. and P. K. Saha, 2011. Technology transfer in TRIPS Agreement: implications for developing countries. Dehradun Law Review. Journal of Law College Dehradun. Vol. 3(1): 12-24. Available at http://www.lawcollegedehradun.com/lawreview/vol_13_issue1_nov10/article2.html. ]
[27. Naghavi, A., 2005. Strategic intellectual property rights policy and North-South technology transfer. Found of Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan. Working paper No. 1805 (33 p.). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=65781. ]
[28. Fink, C. and C. M. Correa, 2009. The global debate on the enforcement of IPRs and developing countries, ICTSD, Issue Paper 22, Geneva (99 p.). Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/new%202009/fink-correa_feb2009.pdf. ]
[29. Directive 98/44/EC of the European parliament and the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biological inventions // OJ L213, 30/07/1998, pp. 13-21. ]
[30. O’Regan, C. A., 2009. Is Intellectual property a hurdle for transfer technology to developing countries? If so, how high of a hurdle? In: Hasting Science & Technology Law Journal. Vol. 1(1): 1-19. ]
[31. Европейская конвенция о выдаче европейских патентов, пересмотренная 17 декабря 1991 года актом пересмотра ст. 63 и актом пересмотра от 29 ноября 2001 г., Инструкция по применению ЕПК // http://www.rupto/ru/mejd_sotr/sod/rus_es/exhibition_corr_ormatted.pdf. ]
[32. See also: Wakasugi, R. and B. Ito, 2009. The effect of stronger IPRs on technology transfer: evidence from Japanese firm-level data. In: Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 34(2): 145-158. ]
[33. Magic, P., 2003. International technology transfer & intellectual property rights, University of Texas (14 p,). Available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~fussell/courses/econtech. ]
[34. See also: Gathii, J.T., 2012. Strength in IP protection and FDI flows in LDCs, Public law & legal theory research paper, University of Chicago (53 p.). Available at http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/cornell-IL-iR/upload/FDIFLOWSLDCGathiicornellPresentationSept12.pdf. ]
[35. McCalman, P. 2005. Who enjoys TRIPS abroad? An empirical analysis of intellectual property rights in the Uruguay round. In: Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 38(2): 574-603. ]
[36. Janjua, P. Z. and G. Samad, 2007. Intellectual property rights and economic growth: the case of middle-income developing countries. In: The Pakistan Development Review. Vol. 46(4): 711-722. ]
[37. Correa, C., 2001. Review of the TRIPS Agreement fostering the trans-fer of technology to developing countries. Third World Network Trade & Development Series. No. 13 (41 p.). Available at http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/t&d/tnd13.pdf. ]
[38. Samad, G., 2011. Panel study “Intellectual property rights and technology transfer: A case of India”, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad (12 p.). Available at http://umconference.um.edu.my/upload/43-1/papers/177%20GhulamSamed.pdf. ]
[39. Fink, C. and C. A. Primo Braga, 2005. How stronger protection of IPRs affects international trade flows. In: Fink, C. and K.E. Maskus (eds.) Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research, Washington, DC, The World Bank /Oxford University Press (354 p.). Available at // http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRIDE/Resouces/Pubs/IPRs-book.pdf. ]
[40. Mazzoleni, R. and R. P. Nelson, 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Elsevier Research Policy. Vol. 27(3): 273-284. Available at http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/MazzoleniNelsonRP1998.pdf. ]
[41. Angeles, L., 2005. Should developing countries strengthen intellectual property rights? In: Berkley Electronic Journal of Macroeconomics,. Vol. 5 (1): 1-25. ]
[42. Correa, C., 1997. New international standards for intellectual property: impact on technology flows and innovation in developing countries. In: Science and Public Policy. Vol. 24(2): 79-92. ]
[43. Islam, M. T., 2010. TRIPS Agreement and economic development: im-plications and challenges for least-developed countries like Bangladesh. In: Nordic Journal of Commercial Law. 2010: Issue 2: 5-10. ]
[44. Roffe, P., 2002. Revisiting the Technology Transfer Debate: Lessons for the New WTO Working Group. In: Bridges, ICTSD, Geneva, Vol. 6(2): 7-10. Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/ictsd/docs/RoffeTesfachewBridgesYear6N2February2002.pdf. ]
[45. Minutes of Meeting of the Council for TRIPS (17 February 2011). WTO document IP/C/M/64, para 337 // http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/trip_24oct11_e.htm. ]
[46. Moon, S., 2008. Does TRIPS Art. 66.2 encourage technology transfer to LDCs? An Analysis of Country Submissions to the TRIPS Council (1999 – 2007) // ICTSD-UNCTAD. Policy Brief No. 2, December 2008, Geneva (12 p.). Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/New%202009/Policy%20Briefs/policy-brief-2.pdf. ]
[47. Bashir A., 2011. International transfer of technology under the TRIPS Agreement (20 p.). Available at http://independent.academia.edu/AhmedBashir7/Papers. ]
[48. Moon, S., 2011. Meaningful technology transfer to the LDCs: proposal for a monitoring mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2, Policy Brief No. 9, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (18 p.). Available at http://ictsd.org/downloads/2011/05/technology-transfer-to-the-ldcs.pdf. ]
[49. Correa, C. 2005. Can the TRIPS Agreement foster technology transfer to developing countries? // Maskus K. and J. Reichman (eds.) International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Re-gime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (Pages: 938). ]
[50. Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (Doha Declaration). WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2, adopted 20 November 2001, para 4. http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm. ]
[51. Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement. Decision of the Council for TRIPS of 19 February 2003. WTO Document IP/C/28 (20 Febru-ary 2003) // http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/ta_docs_e/ipc28_e.pdf. ]
[52. Doha Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns adopt-ed by the WTO Ministerial Conference. WTO document WT/MIN(01)/17 (20 November 2001) // http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_implemetation_e/htm. ]
[53. Shugurov M. V. TRIPS Agreement, international technology transfer and least developed countries. In: Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. 2015. Vol. 2(1): 74-85. ]
[54. Nguyãĕn, T., 2010. Competition law, technology transfer and the TRIPS Agreement: implications for developing countries. Edward Elgar Publish-ing, Cheltenham (346 p.). ]
[55. Correa, C. M., 2007. Intellectual property in the LDCs: Strategies for enhancing technology transfer and dissemination. Background paper No. 4 for UNCTAD, The Least Developed Countries Report 2007 (40 p.). Available at http://unctad.org/Sections/ldc_ dir/docs/ldcr2007_Correa-en.pdf. ]
[56. Dutfield, G. and U. Suthersanen, 2008. Global intellectual property law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (384 p.). ]
[57. Taylor, M. S., 1993. TRIPS, trade and technology transfer. In: Canadi-an Journal of Economics. Vol. 26(3): 625-638. ]
[58. He, J., 2011. Developing countriesʼ pursuit of an intellectual property law balance under the WTO TRIPS Agreement. In: Chinese Journal of Interna-tional Law. Vol. 10(4): 827-863. ]
[59. Yueh, L. Y., 2007. Global IPRs and economic growth. In: Northwest-ern Journal of Technology and IP. Vol. 5(3): 436-448. ]
[60. Sell, S.K., 2003. Private power, public law: the globalization of IPRS, Cambridge University press, Cambridge. (244 p.). ]
[61. Drahos, P. and R. Mayne (eds.), 2002. Global IPRs: knowledge, access and development. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (288 p.). ]
[62. WIPO-Administered Treaties. Available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ ]
[63. Latif, A. A., 2013. From the UNCTAD Code of Conduct to the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement: global efforts for technology transfer. WIPO Regional Consultation on Technology Transfer, ICTSD, Algeria (24 p.). Available at http://www.inapi.org/PDF/WIPO_WORKSHOP/UNCTAD%20Presentation%20Algeria.AAL%2029%201%202012.pdf. ]
[64. Maskus, K. E., 2008. The globalization of intellectual property rights and innovation in services. In: Journal of Industry Competition and Trade. Vol. 8(3-4): 247-267. ]
[65. Correa, C. M., 2000. Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: The TRIPS Agreement and policy options. Zed Books, London (268 p.). ]
[66. Archibugi, D. and A. Filippetti, 2010. The globalization of IPRs: four learned lessons and four theses. In: Global Policy. Vol. 1(2): 137-149. ]
[67. A/RES/35/63 “Restrictive business practices” (5 December 1980) // http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/35/a35r63e.pdf. ]
[68. Fink, C. and C. A. Primo Braga, 2005. How stronger protection of IPRs affects international trade flows? In: Fink, C. and K. E. Maskus (eds.). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. A co-publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press. Washington, DC (354 p.). Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Pubs/IPRs-books.pdf. ]
[69. UNCTAD, WIPO and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The role of the patent system in the transfer of technology to developing countries, Report of the Secretariat General, New York, E-75.II.D.6. Available at http://www.wipo.int/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?bib=21106. ]
[70. General Assembly of United Nations Resolution 2091 (XX). Transfer of technology to developing countries. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/218/54/IMG/NR021854.pdf?OpenElement. ]
[71. General Assembly of United Nations Resolution 1713 (XVI). The role of patents in the transfer of technology to under-developed countries. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/167/66/IMG/NR016766.pdf?OpenElement. ]
[72. United Nations, 1964. The role of patents in the transfer of technology to developing countries. Report of the Secretariat General, UN Publication, New York, 65.II.B.1. Available at http://www.worldcat.org. ]
[73. Sattar A. and T. Mahmood, 2011. Intellectual property rights and economic growth: evidences from high, middle and low income countries. In: Pakistan Economic and Social Review, Department of Economic. Vol. 49(2): 163-186. ]
[74. Butler, J. S. and D. V. Gibson, 2011. Introduction: technology transfer in global perspectives – issues for the twenty-first century. In: Butler, J. S. and D. V. Gibson (eds.). Global perspectives on technology transfer and commercialization: building innovative ecosystems, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (432 p.). ]
[75. Kumar, N., 2002. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: Experience of Asian countries, Study paper, Ch.1, Commission on IPRs (18 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/paper/pdfs/final_report/Ch1final.pdf. ]
[76. Khan, B. Z., 2002. Intellectual property and economic development: lessons from American and European history. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper No. 1a, (58 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/pdfs/study_papers/sp1a_khan_study.pdf. ]
[77. Roffe, P., 2005. Comment I: technology transfer on the international agenda. In: Maksus, K. and J. Reichman (eds.). International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (625 p.). ]
[78. Falvey, R. E., Foster, N. and D. Greenaway, 2006. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of development economics. Vol. 10(4): 700-719. ]
[79. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, 2002. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, London (191 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf. ]
[80. UNCTAD/ICTSD, 2003. Intellectual property rights: implications for development. Policy Discussion Paper, Geneva (156 p.). Available at http://www.ipsonline.org/unctadictsd/Policy%20Discussion%20paper/PP_Introduction.pdf. ]
[81. Fink, C. and K. E. Maksus (eds.), 2005. Intellectual property and development: lessons from economic research, Washington. DC, The World Bank/Oxford University Press (354 p.). Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/ResourcesPubs/IPRs-book.pdf. ]
[82. Gervais, D. J., 2007. TRIPS and development. In: Gervais D. J. (ed.), Intellectual property, trade and development: strategies to optimize economic development in a TRIPS-plus era, Oxford University Press, Oxford (550 p.). ]
[83. Olwan, R. M., 2013. Intellectual property and development: theory and practice, Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (412 p.). ]
[84. Gutterman, A. and J. Erlich, 1997. Technology development and trans-fer. Quorum Books, Westport, Conn (215 p.). ]
[85. Moon, S. 2011. Meaningful technology transfer to the LDCs: a pro-posal for a monitoring mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2 // Policy Brief No 9. International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development. ]
References
[1. Committee on Development and Intellectual property (CDIP). (Fourth Session, Geneva, November 16 to 20, 2009). Comments received by WIPO on the Comments of a Group Like-Minded Countries on the Project on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: Common Challenges: Building Solutions (CDIP/4/7). Annex. Available at http://www.wipo.int/meeting/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=17460. ]
[2. WIPO. CDIP. Neofitsial'nyi dokument po IS i peredache tekhnolo-gii «Obshchie problemy – postroenie reshenii». Neofitsial'nyi dokument № 1. CDIP/5(R) (12/03/2010). Prilozhenie II. Available at http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/cdip_5/cdip_5_ref_non_paper.pdf. ]
[3. Hoekman, B. and B. Smarzyncka Javorcik (eds.), 2006. Global integra-tion and technology transfer. World Bank publications, Washington (346 p.). ]
[4. Saggi, K. 2002. Trade, foreing direct investment, and international technology transfer: a survey. World Bank Observer. 17(2): 191-235. ]
[5. Smith, P. J., 2001. How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sale, and Licenses? In: Journal of International Economics. Vol. 55(2): 411-440. ]
[6. Kim, L., 2003. Technology transfer and intellectual property rights: Lessons from Korea's experience. UNCTAD/ICTSD Working paper No. 2, Ge-neva (41 p.). Available at http://www.ictsd.org/downloads/2008/06/cs_kim.pdf. ]
[7. Kim, L., 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Harvard Business School press, Boston (308 p.). ]
[8. Rasiah, R., 2002. TRIPS an industrial technology development in East and South Asia. In: The European Journal of Development Research. Vol. 14(1): 171-199. ]
[9. Mashelkar, R. 2002. IPRs and the third world. In: Intellectual property rights and the third word. Vol.7(4): 308-323. ]
[10. Falvey, R., Foster, N. and D. Greenaway, 2006. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. In: Review of Development Economics. Vol. 10(4): 700-719. ]
[11. Lal, A. K. and R. W. Clement, 2005. Economic development in India: the role of individual enterprise. In: Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), Center on Integrated Rural Development for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok. Vol. 12(2): 81-99. ]
[12. Correa, C., 2007. Intellectual property in LDCs for enhancing technol-ogy transfer and dissemination. UNCTAD, Background paper No. 4, Geneva (40 p.). Available at http://unctad.org/Sections/Idc_dir/docs/Idcr2007_correa_en.pdf. ]
[13. WIPO Patent Law Treaty, 2000. Available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=288996. ]
[14. WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty, 1970. Available at http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/texts/articles/atoc.htm. ]
[15. Shugurov M. V. Perspectives of international technology transfer in the TRIPs-plus era: problems and solutions. In: European Journal of Social and Human Sciences. 2015. Vol. 5(1): 48-57. ]
[16. Maskus, K., Saggi, K. and T. Puttitanun, 2007. Patent rights and inter-national technology transfer through direct investment and licensing. Paper prepared for the conference “International Public Goods and the Transfer of Technology after TRIPS”. Duke University School, April 4-6, 2003. Available at http://spot.colorado.edu/-maskus/research.html. ]
[17. Kadah, M. M., 2003. Foreing direct investment and international tech-nology transfer to Egypt. In: Economic Research Forum Working paper No. 0317 (23 p.). http://www.egyptchm.org/chm/implementation/pdf/tech_transfer/foreing_direct.pdf. ]
[18. Kingston, G. K. The Implications of 'TRIPS' Agreement 1994 of the World Trade Organization for developing countries. In: African Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 1(1): 37-64. ]
[19. Branstetter, L. G., R. Fisman and C. F. Foley, 2006. Do stronger intel-lectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evi-dence from U.S. firm-level panel data. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 121(1): 320-350. ]
[20. Park, W. G. and D. Lippoldt, 2008. Technology transfer and the eco-nomic implications of strengthening of intellectual property rights in developing countries, OECD Trade Policy working paper No. 62, OECD, Paris (59 p.). Available at http://nw08.american.edu/~wgp/park_lippoldt08.pdf. ]
[21. Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi, 2008. The role of foreing direct investment in international technology transfer: a survey. In: Dutt, A. and J. Ros, (eds.), 2008. International Handbook of Development economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Vol. 2. (612 p.). ]
[22. Thompson, M. A. and F. W. Rushing, 1999. An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth: An Extension. In: Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute of Chung-Ang Uni-versity. Vol. 24 (1): 67-79. ]
[23. Chen, Y. and T. Puttitanun, 2005. IPRs and innovation in developing countries. In: Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 78(2): 474-493. ]
[24. Hall, B. H., 2014. Does patents protection help or hinder technology transfer? In: Ahn, S., Hall, B. H. and K. Lee (eds.) Intellectual property for economic development: issues and policy implication, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Northampton (328 p.). ]
[25. Kumar, N., 2002. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: experience of Asian countries, Study Paper 1b, Ch. 1, Commission on Intellectual Property (18 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final-report/Ch.1final.pdf. ]
[26. Pandey, B. N. and P. K. Saha, 2011. Technology transfer in TRIPS Agreement: implications for developing countries. Dehradun Law Review. Journal of Law College Dehradun. Vol. 3(1): 12-24. Available at http://www.lawcollegedehradun.com/lawreview/vol_13_issue1_nov10/article2.html. ]
[27. Naghavi, A., 2005. Strategic intellectual property rights policy and North-South technology transfer. Found of Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan. Working paper No. 1805 (33 p.). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=65781. ]
[28. Fink, C. and C. M. Correa, 2009. The global debate on the enforcement of IPRs and developing countries, ICTSD, Issue Paper 22, Geneva (99 p.). Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/new%202009/fink-correa_feb2009.pdf. ]
[29. Directive 98/44/EC of the European parliament and the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biological inventions // OJ L213, 30/07/1998, pp. 13-21. ]
[30. O’Regan, C. A., 2009. Is Intellectual property a hurdle for transfer technology to developing countries? If so, how high of a hurdle? In: Hasting Science & Technology Law Journal. Vol. 1(1): 1-19. ]
[31. Evropeiskaya konventsiya o vydache evropeiskikh patentov, peresmotrennaya 17 dekabrya 1991 goda aktom peresmotra st. 63 i aktom peresmotra ot 29 noyabrya 2001 g., Instruktsiya po primeneniyu EPK // http://www.rupto/ru/mejd_sotr/sod/rus_es/exhibition_corr_ormatted.pdf. ]
[32. See also: Wakasugi, R. and B. Ito, 2009. The effect of stronger IPRs on technology transfer: evidence from Japanese firm-level data. In: Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 34(2): 145-158. ]
[33. Magic, P., 2003. International technology transfer & intellectual property rights, University of Texas (14 p,). Available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~fussell/courses/econtech. ]
[34. See also: Gathii, J.T., 2012. Strength in IP protection and FDI flows in LDCs, Public law & legal theory research paper, University of Chicago (53 p.). Available at http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/cornell-IL-iR/upload/FDIFLOWSLDCGathiicornellPresentationSept12.pdf. ]
[35. McCalman, P. 2005. Who enjoys TRIPS abroad? An empirical analysis of intellectual property rights in the Uruguay round. In: Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 38(2): 574-603. ]
[36. Janjua, P. Z. and G. Samad, 2007. Intellectual property rights and economic growth: the case of middle-income developing countries. In: The Pakistan Development Review. Vol. 46(4): 711-722. ]
[37. Correa, C., 2001. Review of the TRIPS Agreement fostering the trans-fer of technology to developing countries. Third World Network Trade & Development Series. No. 13 (41 p.). Available at http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/t&d/tnd13.pdf. ]
[38. Samad, G., 2011. Panel study “Intellectual property rights and technology transfer: A case of India”, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad (12 p.). Available at http://umconference.um.edu.my/upload/43-1/papers/177%20GhulamSamed.pdf. ]
[39. Fink, C. and C. A. Primo Braga, 2005. How stronger protection of IPRs affects international trade flows. In: Fink, C. and K.E. Maskus (eds.) Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research, Washington, DC, The World Bank /Oxford University Press (354 p.). Available at // http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRIDE/Resouces/Pubs/IPRs-book.pdf. ]
[40. Mazzoleni, R. and R. P. Nelson, 1998. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Elsevier Research Policy. Vol. 27(3): 273-284. Available at http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/MazzoleniNelsonRP1998.pdf. ]
[41. Angeles, L., 2005. Should developing countries strengthen intellectual property rights? In: Berkley Electronic Journal of Macroeconomics,. Vol. 5 (1): 1-25. ]
[42. Correa, C., 1997. New international standards for intellectual property: impact on technology flows and innovation in developing countries. In: Science and Public Policy. Vol. 24(2): 79-92. ]
[43. Islam, M. T., 2010. TRIPS Agreement and economic development: im-plications and challenges for least-developed countries like Bangladesh. In: Nordic Journal of Commercial Law. 2010: Issue 2: 5-10. ]
[44. Roffe, P., 2002. Revisiting the Technology Transfer Debate: Lessons for the New WTO Working Group. In: Bridges, ICTSD, Geneva, Vol. 6(2): 7-10. Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/ictsd/docs/RoffeTesfachewBridgesYear6N2February2002.pdf. ]
[45. Minutes of Meeting of the Council for TRIPS (17 February 2011). WTO document IP/C/M/64, para 337 // http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/trip_24oct11_e.htm. ]
[46. Moon, S., 2008. Does TRIPS Art. 66.2 encourage technology transfer to LDCs? An Analysis of Country Submissions to the TRIPS Council (1999 – 2007) // ICTSD-UNCTAD. Policy Brief No. 2, December 2008, Geneva (12 p.). Available at http://www.iprsonline.org/New%202009/Policy%20Briefs/policy-brief-2.pdf. ]
[47. Bashir A., 2011. International transfer of technology under the TRIPS Agreement (20 p.). Available at http://independent.academia.edu/AhmedBashir7/Papers. ]
[48. Moon, S., 2011. Meaningful technology transfer to the LDCs: proposal for a monitoring mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2, Policy Brief No. 9, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (18 p.). Available at http://ictsd.org/downloads/2011/05/technology-transfer-to-the-ldcs.pdf. ]
[49. Correa, C. 2005. Can the TRIPS Agreement foster technology transfer to developing countries? // Maskus K. and J. Reichman (eds.) International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Re-gime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (Pages: 938). ]
[50. Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health (Doha Declaration). WT/MIN(01)/DEC/2, adopted 20 November 2001, para 4. http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm. ]
[51. Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement. Decision of the Council for TRIPS of 19 February 2003. WTO Document IP/C/28 (20 Febru-ary 2003) // http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/ta_docs_e/ipc28_e.pdf. ]
[52. Doha Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns adopt-ed by the WTO Ministerial Conference. WTO document WT/MIN(01)/17 (20 November 2001) // http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_implemetation_e/htm. ]
[53. Shugurov M. V. TRIPS Agreement, international technology transfer and least developed countries. In: Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. 2015. Vol. 2(1): 74-85. ]
[54. Nguyãĕn, T., 2010. Competition law, technology transfer and the TRIPS Agreement: implications for developing countries. Edward Elgar Publish-ing, Cheltenham (346 p.). ]
[55. Correa, C. M., 2007. Intellectual property in the LDCs: Strategies for enhancing technology transfer and dissemination. Background paper No. 4 for UNCTAD, The Least Developed Countries Report 2007 (40 p.). Available at http://unctad.org/Sections/ldc_ dir/docs/ldcr2007_Correa-en.pdf. ]
[56. Dutfield, G. and U. Suthersanen, 2008. Global intellectual property law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (384 p.). ]
[57. Taylor, M. S., 1993. TRIPS, trade and technology transfer. In: Canadi-an Journal of Economics. Vol. 26(3): 625-638. ]
[58. He, J., 2011. Developing countriesʼ pursuit of an intellectual property law balance under the WTO TRIPS Agreement. In: Chinese Journal of Interna-tional Law. Vol. 10(4): 827-863. ]
[59. Yueh, L. Y., 2007. Global IPRs and economic growth. In: Northwest-ern Journal of Technology and IP. Vol. 5(3): 436-448. ]
[60. Sell, S.K., 2003. Private power, public law: the globalization of IPRS, Cambridge University press, Cambridge. (244 p.). ]
[61. Drahos, P. and R. Mayne (eds.), 2002. Global IPRs: knowledge, access and development. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (288 p.). ]
[62. WIPO-Administered Treaties. Available at http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ ]
[63. Latif, A. A., 2013. From the UNCTAD Code of Conduct to the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement: global efforts for technology transfer. WIPO Regional Consultation on Technology Transfer, ICTSD, Algeria (24 p.). Available at http://www.inapi.org/PDF/WIPO_WORKSHOP/UNCTAD%20Presentation%20Algeria.AAL%2029%201%202012.pdf. ]
[64. Maskus, K. E., 2008. The globalization of intellectual property rights and innovation in services. In: Journal of Industry Competition and Trade. Vol. 8(3-4): 247-267. ]
[65. Correa, C. M., 2000. Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: The TRIPS Agreement and policy options. Zed Books, London (268 p.). ]
[66. Archibugi, D. and A. Filippetti, 2010. The globalization of IPRs: four learned lessons and four theses. In: Global Policy. Vol. 1(2): 137-149. ]
[67. A/RES/35/63 “Restrictive business practices” (5 December 1980) // http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/35/a35r63e.pdf. ]
[68. Fink, C. and C. A. Primo Braga, 2005. How stronger protection of IPRs affects international trade flows? In: Fink, C. and K. E. Maskus (eds.). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. A co-publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press. Washington, DC (354 p.). Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Pubs/IPRs-books.pdf. ]
[69. UNCTAD, WIPO and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The role of the patent system in the transfer of technology to developing countries, Report of the Secretariat General, New York, E-75.II.D.6. Available at http://www.wipo.int/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?bib=21106. ]
[70. General Assembly of United Nations Resolution 2091 (XX). Transfer of technology to developing countries. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/218/54/IMG/NR021854.pdf?OpenElement. ]
[71. General Assembly of United Nations Resolution 1713 (XVI). The role of patents in the transfer of technology to under-developed countries. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/167/66/IMG/NR016766.pdf?OpenElement. ]
[72. United Nations, 1964. The role of patents in the transfer of technology to developing countries. Report of the Secretariat General, UN Publication, New York, 65.II.B.1. Available at http://www.worldcat.org. ]
[73. Sattar A. and T. Mahmood, 2011. Intellectual property rights and economic growth: evidences from high, middle and low income countries. In: Pakistan Economic and Social Review, Department of Economic. Vol. 49(2): 163-186. ]
[74. Butler, J. S. and D. V. Gibson, 2011. Introduction: technology transfer in global perspectives – issues for the twenty-first century. In: Butler, J. S. and D. V. Gibson (eds.). Global perspectives on technology transfer and commercialization: building innovative ecosystems, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (432 p.). ]
[75. Kumar, N., 2002. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: Experience of Asian countries, Study paper, Ch.1, Commission on IPRs (18 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/paper/pdfs/final_report/Ch1final.pdf. ]
[76. Khan, B. Z., 2002. Intellectual property and economic development: lessons from American and European history. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper No. 1a, (58 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/pdfs/study_papers/sp1a_khan_study.pdf. ]
[77. Roffe, P., 2005. Comment I: technology transfer on the international agenda. In: Maksus, K. and J. Reichman (eds.). International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (625 p.). ]
[78. Falvey, R. E., Foster, N. and D. Greenaway, 2006. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of development economics. Vol. 10(4): 700-719. ]
[79. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, 2002. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, London (191 p.). Available at http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf. ]
[80. UNCTAD/ICTSD, 2003. Intellectual property rights: implications for development. Policy Discussion Paper, Geneva (156 p.). Available at http://www.ipsonline.org/unctadictsd/Policy%20Discussion%20paper/PP_Introduction.pdf. ]
[81. Fink, C. and K. E. Maksus (eds.), 2005. Intellectual property and development: lessons from economic research, Washington. DC, The World Bank/Oxford University Press (354 p.). Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/ResourcesPubs/IPRs-book.pdf. ]
[82. Gervais, D. J., 2007. TRIPS and development. In: Gervais D. J. (ed.), Intellectual property, trade and development: strategies to optimize economic development in a TRIPS-plus era, Oxford University Press, Oxford (550 p.). ]
[83. Olwan, R. M., 2013. Intellectual property and development: theory and practice, Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (412 p.). ]
[84. Gutterman, A. and J. Erlich, 1997. Technology development and trans-fer. Quorum Books, Westport, Conn (215 p.). ]
[85. Moon, S. 2011. Meaningful technology transfer to the LDCs: a pro-posal for a monitoring mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2 // Policy Brief No 9. International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development. ]
Издательство
 
Авторам
 
Услуги
 
Разное
 
Наши сайты

© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.